|
Turkey
Economy: Market Opportunities
|
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Population (m) |
73.3 |
74.3 |
75.2 |
76.2 |
77.2 |
78.1 |
GDP (US$ bn at market exchange rates) |
363 |
384 |
386 |
422 |
452 |
493 |
GDP per head (US$ at market exchange rates) |
4,947 |
5,177 |
5,131 |
5,543 |
5,862 |
6,315 |
GDP (US$ bn at PPP) |
593.5 |
644.7 |
694.6 |
756.9 |
823.6 |
895.4 |
GDP per head (US$ at PPP) |
8,097 |
8,682 |
9,236 |
9,939 |
10,675 |
11,464 |
Personal disposable income (US$ bn) |
215.1 |
230.5 |
236.0 |
253.9 |
267.2 |
285.9 |
Median household income (US$) |
8,812 |
9,285 |
9,357 |
9,899 |
10,253 |
10,800 |
Household consumption (US$ bn) |
245 |
263 |
271 |
292 |
309 |
331 |
Household consumption per head (US$) |
3,340 |
3,550 |
3,600 |
3,840 |
4,000 |
4,240 |
Exports of goods & services (% change) |
8.5 |
5.3 |
8.2 |
9.3 |
9.2 |
9.5 |
Imports of goods & services (% change) |
11.5 |
8.3 |
7.2 |
9.1 |
8.4 |
9.1 |
GDP per head is low, but the market is large
Turkey has a population of about 73m, making it
potentially the second-largest market in Europe (behind
Germany). The rate of population growth in Turkey is
estimated to have averaged 1.4% per year in 2001-05,
compared with 1.8% in the 1990s and around 2.5%
between 1945 and 1980. About 50% of Turkey's
population is under the age of 25. Income levels are
rising, especially in urban areas. Almost 70% of the
population is now urbanised. Over one-quarter lives
in the Marmara region in the north-west, including
the Istanbul conurbation and its neighbouring
provinces and the fourth-largest city Bursa. Also
still growing rapidly are the populations of Ankara
and Izmir, the second- and third-largest cities, and
most other larger provincial centres, particularly
those of the south and south-east. In the south-east,
birth rates are still relatively high, and internal
migration away from conflict areas has accelerated
urbanisation. The Economist Intelligence Unit
expects Turkey's population to grow by about 1.3%
per year during the forecast period, well above the
rate of growth that will be experienced in most
European countries.
GDP per head has risen sharply since the 2001
financial crisis and recession, although it remains
lower than in the central European countries. After
declining sharply in 2001 to US$2,100, GDP per head
(at market exchange rates) recovered to US$2,600 in
2002, then went on rising to reach an estimated
US$5,000 in 2005, assisted by the continuing
strength of the lira against the US dollar in real
terms. Under our baseline forecast of average annual
GDP growth of about 5% in 2006-10 and population
growth of 1.3% a year, we expect GDP per head to be
in the region of US$6,300 by the end of the forecast
period. This is still low, at less than 20% of the
projected EU25 average in 2010. It should also be
mentioned, however, that Turkey's GDP data may fail
to capture the full effects of the country's large
informal sector--which amounts to around 50% of the
formal sector's GDP, according to the government.
Spending power varies greatly from consumer to
consumer
GDP per head shows wide variations from region to
region, between rural and urban areas, and within
major cities. National data for 2002 indicate that
GDP per head was nearly 11 times higher in
industrialised Kocaeli, adjacent to Istanbul, than
in the eastern province of Mus. According to the
household expenditure survey for 2004 by the
national statistics office, the Turkish Statistical
Institute, the quintile (20%) of households with the
highest incomes was responsible for 38% of consumer
spending. The other quintiles were responsible for
22.7%, 17.2%, 12.9% and 9.1% of consumer spending
respectively. Income distribution data for the same
year show that the top quintile enjoyed 46.2% of
income, followed by 21.9%, 15.2%, 10.7% and 6% for
the successive quintiles. This represented a slight
improvement compared with 2002 and 2003. On this
basis, inequality in Turkey was much higher than in
most developed countries or in central Europe and
also higher than in many developing countries,
although not as high as in some Latin American
countries with comparable levels of national income
per head. These inequalities--especially the
geographical ones--are unlikely to decline
significantly in the forecast period. The Gini
coefficient, which is used to measure income
concentration, fell from 44 in 2002 to 40 in 2004 (0
represents perfect income equality, and 100 perfect
income inequality), according to the Turkish
Statistical Institute. However, this may not be
indicative of a long-term trend, as sharp shifts in
the currency and interest rates in Turkey will
continue to have substantially different effects on
the disposable income of different income groups.
|