Turkey Finance: Teething
Troubles For The Mortgage Market
Hailed as a way of extending property
ownership among Turkey's low paid workforce, the new
mortgage law has run into problems even before the
first deal has been struck
A combination of high interest rates
and political and economic uncertainty mean that the
long term variable interest mortgages available for
the first time, will be out of reach to the very
people they are supposed to benefit. Worse still, as
buy-to-let increasingly becomes a safe investment
option for Turkey's rich middle classes some
analysts fear the introduction of mortgages could
benefit those who already own property at the
expense of non-home owners.
Best laid plans
On paper Turkey's new mortgage law
does seem like both an inevitable result of a new
low-inflation economy and at the same time a long
awaited panacea for the problem of extending home
ownership to the poorest quartile of Turkey's urban
population who live in rented accommodation.
As ever in Turkey, things are not
quite that simple. Sure enough new legislation
allowing the introduction of securitised variable
rate long-term mortgages has been passed through
parliament and the passage of further legislation
allowing for a secondary market is expected to be
passed before this year's general election, which
together should allow for the issuing of the first
mortgage-backed securities and the first mortgages
to be issued early in 2008.
With home loans still a rarity in
Turkey and demand for new homes only set to increase
with the aging of the currently young demographic
profile and the continuing trend to urbanisation, no
one argues that the new mortgage law is anything but
needed. However, while as recently as two years ago
analysts were gung-ho about the possible effects of
the new law, few now expect it to have anything like
a major short-term effect.
To begin with they point out that
both demand for housing and house prices have been
dropping since mid last year when the government
jacked up interest rates to 17.5% to halt a run on
the Turkish lira, and attack inflation which had
begun rising again.
Pre-crisis monthly interest rates of
1% and the promise that the introduction of
mortgages would spark a price boom persuaded many to
fund property purchases on standard bank loans,
pushing property prices to an historic high. However
post-crisis rates of 1.5% per month have forced a
drop in property prices of an average 10-15% in
Turkey's main urban centres, fuelling suspicion that
the market may have peaked and that any "mortgage
law" effect has already been and gone.
Now with no indication when, if at
all, the government can rein in inflation and bring
down interest rates, and with it already having axed
plans to offer tax incentives to mortgage holders,
analysts point out that the potential market for the
new financial products is appearing increasingly
limited. They point out that the majority of the
estimated 16m people living in rented accommodation
simply don't earn sufficiently high salaries to be
able to service a variable rate mortgage, and that
without any form of tax incentives there is very
little difference for the customer between the new
mortgages and existing bank loans, which under
existing legislation can be extended for as long as
ten years. Indeed, some contend that given ongoing
political and economic uncertainties low earners may
actually prefer the existing short term loans,
supplementing them with informal credit arrangements
within extended family groups--the traditional
system of financing house purchases for the bulk of
the Turkish population.
Buy-to-let
At the same time, analysts point out
that new housing projects in Turkey's major urban
centres where the majority of demand for new housing
is being experienced are aimed at the upper income
groups, with the majority of purchases over the past
few years believed to be being made as investments,
either for re-sale as prices increase or as
buy-to-let. Where, they ask, are the housing schemes
aimed at first-time buyers and low income groups,
who had been expected to make up the bulk of those
taking advantage of the new mortgage law?
With the continuing effects of high
interest rates and low public confidence expected to
depress demand for new mortgages from the low income
groups the new products had been designed to serve,
the main group that will be able to fund new
purchases will be those with a higher disposable
income who already own property and who are less
susceptible to economic instability--in other words
buy-to-let investors.
The introduction of mortgages might
even fuel a new price boom, as existing property
owners compete to take advantage of the new mortgage
products to build up their own property portfolios,
further pushing up prices out of the reach of the
low income groups. It is a scenario that the current
government has to date preferred to ignore, but
which, assuming it is returned with a working
majority following general elections later this
year, it may yet be forced to address.
|